Main Page Sitemap

Summative assessment in education essay


summative assessment in education essay

value. Session.1 (11:00 12:30 chair: Anne Oberholzer, validity, Fairness and Equal Opportunities; Meritocracy and the moral responsibility of researchers and practitioners. Caroline Jongkamp, Nico Dieteren (cito Netherlands 14:00 17:00 armazi hall, pre- Conference Workshop 2, computer based and computer adaptive testing for large-scale, high-stakes exams. Opening Ceremony 09:30 10:30, chair: Gordon Stobart, keynote Speaker, jo-Anne Baird, Oxford University Centre for Educational. The detailed Conference Program will be grading a moral criticism essay added later. Teachers are left facing serious dilemmas. Other areas may be better tapped through open-ended questions or performance-based assessments, where students demonstrate their abilities and understandings such as with an actual hands-on investigation (Shavelson Ruiz-Primo, 1999). Monica Stanley, Safoora Gqotso, South Africa Paper 2: Addressing the high repetition rate through a policy on learner progression in the Republic of South Africa Priscilla Ogunbanjo, Rufus Poliah, South Africa Paper 3: Using the Life Orientation Common Assessment Task to assess intercultural competence. Ariyo, Patrick Onyeneho, Nigeria 10:30 11:00 Coffee Break Rustaveli Ballroom 11:00 12:00 Chair: Tamar Gagoshidze Keynote Steve Rivkin, University of Illinois Chicago Teacher and School Leader Evaluation and Compensation rustaveli ballroom 12:00 12:30 Closing Ceremony 12:30-14:00 Lunch Armazi Hall 14:00 16:00 Post Conference Workshop Issues.

Argumentative Essay on Israeli Palestinian War



summative assessment in education essay

Summative assessment in education essay
summative assessment in education essay

Clifford geertz deep play essay
Write a descriptive essay about nigeria
Does uf require act essay

How to assess higher order thinking skills? Sunday, October 1 hotel lobby 10:00 17:00, registration 11:00 14:00 Rustaveli Ballroom, pre-Conference Workshop. Lena Gray, UK, lazika Hall Session.2 (11:00 12:30) Chair: Frans Kleintjes Validity, Fairness and Equal Opportunities; Fighting Differential Item Functioning and Unbalanced Assessments Paper 1: The fairness of our tests: reporting on item-level DIF analysis moving observer essays of high-stakes exams in England Ben Smith, Ruth Johnson. Gordon Stobart, UK, paper 2: Fair assessment in an unfair world, isabel Nisbet,. It is not just that some aspects of multiple-choice testing may have adverse consequences for teaching and learning, but that some aspects of all testing, even performance testing, may have adverse as well as beneficial educational consequences. The foundations for a standards-based summative assessment system are assessments that are systemically valid: aligned to the recommendations of the national standards, grounded in the educational system, and congruent with the educational goals for students. No assessment form is immune from negative influences. Assessing inquiry skills may require extended investigations and can be documented through portfolios of work as it unfolds.

Fariza Imashpayeva, Nazgul Tuitina, Kazakhstan Kazbegi Hall Session.4  (11:00 12:30) Chair: Saskia Wools The Impact of Testing on the Curriculum and Approaches to Learning; Formative Assessment Practices Paper 1: Use of peer assessment to achieve subject content coverage Patience Chinyere Agommuoh, Ursula Ngozi Akanwa. Final results of an RCT study on a school-wide reading programme Grace Grima, Alistair Hooper, UK Paper 2: The role of technology in supporting the creation of fair tests Melissa Mackinlay, UK Rustaveli Ballroom Session.3 (10:30 12:00) Chair: Jo-Anne Baird The Global Agenda for. Theory and practice for paper based and computer based item formats.


Sitemap